Bob_NNP Cesca_NNP 's_POS Awesome_NNP Blog_NNP !_. 
Go_VB !_. 
/_NN /_NN Copyright_NNP (_( c_SYM )_) 1996_CD -_: 1997_CD Athenia_NNP Associates_NNPS ._. /_NN /_NN http://www.webreference.com/js/_NN /_NN /_NN License_NNP is_VBZ granted_VBN if_IN and_CC only_RB if_IN this_DT entire_JJ /_NN /_NN copyright_NN notice_NN is_VBZ included_VBN ._. 
By_IN Tomer_NNP Shiran_NNP ._. 

October_NNP 19_CD ,_, 2010_CD 

Effing_NNP Idiot_NNP 
Go_VB to_TO 2:50_NN and_CC listen_VB as_IN the_DT audience_NN laughs_VBZ and_CC laughs_VBZ at_IN O_NNP '_POS Donnell_NNP 's_POS stupidity_NN ._. 

Damn_NNP ._. 
Well_RB ,_, at_IN least_JJS she_PRP 's_VBZ losing_VBG ._. 
Badly_RB ._. 
Thanks_NNS again_RB ,_, Sarah_NNP Palin_NNP !_. 
You_PRP successfully_RB turned_VBD a_DT Republican_JJ seat_NN to_TO a_DT ,_, you_PRP know_VBP ,_, "_'' Marxist_JJ "_'' seat_NN ._. 
Good_JJ job_NN ._. 
You_PRP 're_VBP a_DT genius_NN ._. 

Filed_NNP under_IN :_: Christine_NNP O_NNP '_POS Donnell_NNP ,_, Election_NNP 2010_CD ,_, Sarah_NNP Palin_NNP ,_, Teabaggers_NNP ,_, Wingnuts_NNP 

Posted_VBN By_IN Bob_NNP Cesca_NNP |_NN October_NNP 19_CD ,_, 2010_CD 2:43_NN PM_NNP 
Comments_NNS 
I_PRP heard_VBD this_DT same_JJ accusation_NN on_IN Kos_NNP today_NN ,_, that_IN the_DT audience_NN is_VBZ laughing_VBG AT_NNP Christine_NNP O_NNP '_POS Donnell_NNP on_IN the_DT first_JJ thing_NN she_PRP says_VBZ ,_, but_CC I_PRP disagree_VBP entirely_RB 
:_: On_IN THAT_WDT point_VBP ,_, HER_NNP supporters_NNS are_VBP laughing_VBG at_IN COONS_NNP ,_, it_PRP 's_VBZ absolutely_RB a_DT "_'' She_PRP 's_VBZ got_VBD YOU_PRP ,_, DUMBASS_NNP !_. !_. "_'' laugh_NN ,_, the_DT sort_NN of_IN "_'' Oh-_NNP No-_NNP She-_NNP D_NNP '_POS I_PRP '_POS INT_NNP !_. "_'' laugh_NN you_PRP 'd_MD hear_VB from_IN a_DT studio_NN audience_NN when_WRB the_DT slightly_RB stupid_JJ but_CC affable_JJ and_CC hitherto_NN ineffective_JJ Dunce_NNP Character_NN finally_RB gets_VBZ a_DT zinger_NN in_IN on_IN the_DT Handsome_NNP Lead_JJ ._. 

Remember_VB that_IN at_IN least_JJS half_PDT the_DT audience_NN in_IN a_DT venue_NN like_IN this_DT would_MD be_VB there_EX to_TO support_VB O_NNP '_POS Donnell_NNP ,_, and_CC the_DT "_'' Point_NNP to_TO '_POS Separation_NNP of_IN Church_NNP and_CC State_NNP '_POS in_IN the_DT Constitution_NNP "_'' dig_NN is_VBZ a_DT virulently_RB popular_JJ meme_NN in_IN the_DT loonosphere_NN from_IN whence_NN comes_VBZ the_DT Teabagger_NNP Political_NNP Playbook_NNP ._. 
Those_DT are_VBP hoots_NNS and_CC calls_NNS of_IN SUPPORT_NNP for_IN O_NNP '_POS Donnell_NNP supposedly_RB putting_VBG one_CD over_IN on_IN Coons_NNP ,_, they_PRP are_VBP n't_RB laughing_VBG at_IN her_PRP ._. 

There_EX may_MD very_RB well_RB have_VB been_VBN a_DT gasp_VB ,_, and_CC some_DT uncomfortable_JJ "_'' Okay_UH ,_, that_DT 's_VBZ enough_RB now_RB "_'' chuckles_VBZ at_IN the_DT end_NN ,_, but_CC the_DT guffaws_NNS at_IN the_DT top_NN of_IN the_DT clip_NN are_VBP WITH_IN her_PRP$ ,_, not_RB AT_NNP her_PRP ._. 

Posted_VBN by_IN :_: ELDING_NNP at_IN October_NNP 19_CD ,_, 2010_CD 2:52_NN PM_NNP 
Hilarious_NNP ._. 

Posted_VBN by_IN :_: adx_NN at_IN October_NNP 19_CD ,_, 2010_CD 3:00_NN PM_NNP 
I_PRP do_VBP n't_RB think_VB the_DT audience_NN is_VBZ laughing_VBG at_IN Coons_NNP ;_: the_DT laughter_NN has_VBZ an_DT incredulous_JJ ,_, oh-my-god_JJ sound_NN to_TO it_PRP ._. 
But_CC it_PRP 's_VBZ obvious_JJ that_IN O_NNP '_POS Donnell_NNP thinks_VBZ they_PRP 're_VBP laughing_VBG at_IN him_PRP ,_, not_RB her_PRP ._. 
When_WRB she_PRP hears_VBZ the_DT reaction_NN ,_, she_PRP looks_VBZ out_RB at_IN the_DT audience_NN with_IN a_DT big_JJ ,_, proud_JJ grin_NN ._. 
She_PRP thinks_VBZ she_PRP just_RB scored_VBD mucho_NN points_NNS on_IN Baldy_NNP ._. 

Elding_NNP is_VBZ right_NN ;_: "_'' separation_NN of_IN church_NN and_CC state_NN is_VBZ n't_RB in_IN the_DT Constitution_NNP "_'' is_VBZ a_DT major_JJ wingnut_NN talking_NN point_NN ._. 
They_PRP routinely_RB claim_VBP that_IN the_DT establishment_NN of_IN religion_NN clause_NN does_VBZ n't_RB mean_VB what_WP everyone_NN else_RB thinks_VBZ it_PRP means_VBZ ._. 
So_RB although_IN this_DT shows_VBZ what_WP an_DT extremist_NN nut_NN O_NNP '_POS Donnell_NNP is_VBZ ,_, it_PRP 's_VBZ not_RB really_RB a_DT gaffe_NN ;_: it_PRP 's_VBZ standard_JJ stuff_NN right_NN out_IN of_IN their_PRP$ playbook_NN ._. 

Posted_VBN by_IN :_: Steve_NNP 8489_CD at_IN October_NNP 19_CD ,_, 2010_CD 3:04_NN PM_NNP 
Well_RB ,_, if_IN one_CD is_VBZ looking_VBG for_IN the_DT phrase_NN ,_, "_'' Separation_NNP of_IN Church_NNP and_CC State_NNP ,_, "_'' yeah_UH ,_, that_DT 's_VBZ not_RB in_IN there_RB ,_, so_RB TADA_NNP !_. 
Yay_NNP !_. 
Looks_NNP at_IN me_PRP ,_, I_PRP wins_VBZ a_DT big_JJ arguments_NNS and_CC I_PRP poops_NNS my_PRP$ pants_NNS ._. 
But_CC the_DT principle_NN is_VBZ in_IN there_RB ._. 
I_PRP love_VBP when_WRB ignorant_NN fucks_NNS like_IN O_NNP '_POS Donnell_NNP and_CC her_PRP$ little_JJ orcling_VBG hordes_NNS make_VBP huge_JJ category_NN mistakes_NNS like_IN this_DT ._. 
It_PRP 's_VBZ is_VBZ akin_JJ to_TO taking_VBG a_DT tour_NN of_IN a_DT college_NN and_CC starting_VBG it_PRP off_RP at_IN the_DT administration_NN offices_NNS and_CC when_WRB that_DT part_NN of_IN the_DT tour_NN is_VBZ finished_VBN ,_, someone_NN like_IN O_NNP '_POS Donnell_NNP says_VBZ ,_, "_'' Ok_NN ,_, that_DT 's_VBZ great_JJ ,_, but_CC when_WRB are_VBP we_PRP gonna_VBG start_VBG seeing_VBG the_DT college_NN ?_. 
"_'' 
Posted_VBN by_IN :_: at_IN October_NNP 19_CD ,_, 2010_CD 3:10_NN PM_NNP 
Yes_UH ,_, it_PRP 's_VBZ standard_JJ stuff_NN ,_, and_CC HER_NNP CROWD_NNP would_MD have_VB springboarded_JJ OFF_NNP of_IN it_PRP ,_, that_DT 's_VBZ what_WP I_PRP 'm_VBP saying_VBG :_: As_RB far_RB as_IN she_PRP 's_VBZ concerned_VBN ,_, it_PRP 's_VBZ not_RB a_DT gaffe_NN ,_, and_CC as_RB far_RB as_IN HER_NNP SUPPORTERS_NNP in_IN the_DT room_NN are_VBP concerned_VBN ,_, it_PRP was_VBD not_RB only_RB NOT_NNP a_DT gaffe_NN ,_, it_PRP was_VBD a_DT Direct_NNP Hit_VBP ._. 
They_PRP should_MD have_VB applauded_VBD ,_, that_WDT would_MD have_VB settled_VBN this_DT matter_NN for_IN good_NN ._. 
I_PRP 'm_VBP convinced_VBN that_DT 's_VBZ not_RB laughing_VBG at_IN her_PRP$ ,_, that_DT 's_VBZ "_'' Ooo_NNP ,_, good_JJ one_CD !_. "_'' FOR_IN her_PRP ._. 

Posted_VBN by_IN :_: ELDING_NNP at_IN October_NNP 19_CD ,_, 2010_CD 3:11_NN PM_NNP 
Well_RB ELDING_NNP ,_, its_PRP$ already_RB being_VBG reported_VBN that_IN it_PRP was_VBD HER_NNP that_WDT was_VBD clueless_JJ so_RB Coons_NNP gets_VBZ the_DT last_JJ laugh_NN on_IN that_DT ._. 

Posted_VBN by_IN :_: Allonfla_NNP at_IN October_NNP 19_CD ,_, 2010_CD 3:30_NN PM_NNP 
I_PRP do_VBP n't_RB believe_VB this_DT was_VBD a_DT public_JJ event_NN ,_, Elvis_NNP ,_, I_PRP think_VBP it_PRP was_VBD a_DT debate_NN before_IN the_DT students_NNS at_IN the_DT law_NN school_NN ._. 
I_PRP mean_VBP ,_, it_PRP could_MD be_VB some_DT of_IN her_PRP$ supporters_NNS infiltrated_VBN ,_, but_CC I_PRP truly_RB believe_VBP there_EX would_MD 've_VB been_VBN lots_NNS of_IN catcalling_VBG ,_, etc._NN if_IN that_DT were_VBD the_DT case_NN ._. 

Posted_VBN by_IN :_: pea_NN at_IN October_NNP 19_CD ,_, 2010_CD 3:30_NN PM_NNP 
Yeah_UH ,_, Pea_NNP ,_, you_PRP have_VBP a_DT point_NN there_RB ,_, but_CC still_RB :_: The_DT laughter_NN does_VBZ n't_RB sound_VB incredulous_JJ to_TO me_PRP ,_, it_PRP sounds_VBZ appreciative_JJ and_CC snarky_NN ._. 
Put_VB yourself_PRP in_IN a_DT non-partisan_JJ Law_NNP School_NNP Student_NNP position_NN :_: Would_MD you_PRP laugh_VB at_IN loud_JJ at_IN a_DT Teabagger_NNP Meme_NNP like_IN the_DT one_CD she_PRP dropped_VBD ,_, or_CC would_MD you_PRP mutter_NN /_NN grumble_VBP to_TO yourself_PRP ,_, whispering_VBG to_TO your_PRP$ colleague_NN ,_, "_'' What_WP a_DT fucking_VBG idiot_NN !_. 
"_'' I_PRP do_VBP n't_RB see_VB a_DT crowd_NN like_IN that_DT laughing_VBG out_IN loud_JJ at_IN such_JJ a_DT pitiful_JJ little_JJ meme_NN ,_, it_PRP 's_VBZ not_RB even_RB worth_JJ a_DT laugh-out-loud_JJ guffaw_NN ._. 

Posted_VBN by_IN :_: ELDING_NNP at_IN October_NNP 19_CD ,_, 2010_CD 3:53_NN PM_NNP 
well_RB ,_, keep_VB in_IN mind_NN that_IN all_DT of_IN them_PRP probably_RB know_VBP what_WP a_DT freak_NN she_PRP is_VBZ ._. 
I_PRP think_VBP it_PRP might_MD be_VB more_JJR of_IN a_DT "_'' holy_JJ crap_NN ,_, I_PRP ca_MD n't_RB believe_VB she_PRP just_RB topped_VBD all_PDT the_DT other_JJ stupid_JJ shit_NN she_PRP 's_VBZ said_VBD ,_, and_CC I_PRP got_VBD to_TO bear_VB witness_NN to_TO it_PRP !_. "_'' laughter_NN ._. 
I_PRP know_VBP if_IN I_PRP had_VBD the_DT opportunity_NN to_TO attend_VB a_DT Sarah_NNP Palin_NNP rally_NN ,_, I_PRP 'd_MD be_VB overjoyed_JJ to_TO hear_VB some_DT incredible_JJ stupid_JJ falling_NN out_IN of_IN her_PRP$ mouth_NN ._. 

Posted_VBN by_IN :_: pea_NN at_IN October_NNP 19_CD ,_, 2010_CD 4:07_NN PM_NNP 
which_WDT would_MD be_VB ,_, uh_UH ,_, ANY_NNP Sarah_NNP Palin_NNP rally_NN ._. 
Also_RB ._. 

Posted_VBN by_IN :_: pea_NN at_IN October_NNP 19_CD ,_, 2010_CD 4:08_NN PM_NNP 
ELDING_NNP ......_. 

the_DT debate_NN was_VBD at_IN a_DT LAW_NNP SCHOOL_NNP ._. 
You_PRP really_RB think_VBP lawyers_NNS are_VBP going_VBG to_TO laugh_VB at_IN Coons_NNP rather_RB than_IN O_NNP '_POS Donnell_NNP ???_. 

Not_RB a_DT snowballs_NNS chance_VBP in_IN hell_NN ._. 

Posted_VBN by_IN :_: Nicole_NNP 473_CD at_IN October_NNP 19_CD ,_, 2010_CD 5:00_NN PM_NNP 
Excerpts_NNS from_IN http://tinyurl.com/26ddbvd_NN 

"_'' '_POS You_PRP actually_RB audibly_RB heard_VBD the_DT crowd_NN gasp_VB ,_, '_'' Widener_NNP University_NNP political_JJ scientist_NN Wesley_NNP Leckrone_NNP said_VBD after_IN the_DT debate_NN ,_, adding_VBG that_IN it_PRP raised_VBD questions_NNS about_IN O_NNP '_POS Donnell_NNP 's_POS grasp_NN of_IN the_DT Constitution_NNP ._. 

Erin_NNP Daly_NNP ,_, a_DT Widener_NNP professor_NN who_WP specializes_VBZ in_IN constitutional_JJ law_NN ,_, said_VBD that_IN while_IN there_EX are_VBP questions_NNS about_IN what_WP counts_VBZ as_IN government_NN promotion_NN of_IN religion_NN ,_, there_EX is_VBZ little_JJ debate_NN over_IN whether_IN the_DT First_CD Amendment_NNP prohibits_VBZ the_DT federal_JJ government_NN from_IN making_VBG laws_NNS establishing_VBG religion_NN ._. 

"_'' She_PRP seemed_VBD genuinely_RB surprised_VBN that_IN the_DT principle_NN of_IN separation_NN of_IN church_NN and_CC state_NN derives_VBZ from_IN the_DT First_CD Amendment_NNP ,_, and_CC I_PRP think_VBP to_TO many_JJ of_IN us_PRP in_IN the_DT law_NN school_NN that_WDT was_VBD a_DT surprise_NN ,_, "_'' Daly_NNP said_VBD ._. 
"_'' It_PRP 's_VBZ one_CD thing_NN to_TO not_RB know_VB the_DT 17th_JJ Amendment_NNP or_CC some_DT of_IN the_DT others_NNS ,_, but_CC most_JJS Americans_NNPS do_VBP know_VB the_DT basics_NNS of_IN the_DT First_CD Amendment_NNP ._. 
"_'' 
O_NNP '_POS Donnell_NNP did_VBD n't_RB respond_VB to_TO reporters_NNS who_WP asked_VBD her_PRP to_TO clarify_VB her_PRP$ views_NNS after_IN the_DT debate_NN ._. 
"_'' 
Posted_VBN by_IN :_: Big_NNP __NN Ben_NNP at_IN October_NNP 19_CD ,_, 2010_CD 5:48_NN PM_NNP 
Anyone_NN who_WP says_VBZ "_'' Evolution_NNP is_VBZ only_RB a_DT THEORY_NNP ..._... it_PRP 's_VBZ not_RB a_DT fact_NN "_'' is_VBZ so_RB stupid_JJ ;_: so_RB utterly_RB fucking_VBG brainless_JJ ,_, uneducated_JJ ,_, ignorant_NN ,_, clueless_JJ and_CC unread_JJ they_PRP should_MD immediately_RB be_VB sterilized_VBN on_IN the_DT slim_JJ chance_NN that_IN there_EX 's_VBZ a_DT genetic_JJ component_NN to_TO their_PRP$ imbecility_NN ._. 
Anyone_NN who_WP stubbornly_RB knows_VBZ so_RB little_JJ about_IN science_NN can_MD not_RB possibly_RB be_VB expected_VBN to_TO develop_VB the_DT analytical_JJ skills_NNS necessary_JJ to_TO interpret_VB Con_NN Law_NNP ._. 

Posted_VBN by_IN :_: cousinavi_NN at_IN October_NNP 19_CD ,_, 2010_CD 5:50_NN PM_NNP 
If_IN the_DT laughter_NN was_VBD with_IN her_PRP$ ,_, then_RB the_DT joke_NN is_VBZ on_IN everyone_NN there_RB in_IN support_NN ,_, of_IN course_NN ,_, because_IN moments_NNS later_RB ,_, after_IN she_PRP 's_VBZ basically_RB pounding_VBG the_DT desk_NN talking_VBG about_IN the_DT constitution_NN and_CC her_PRP$ unyielding_VBG devotion_NN to_TO that_DT which_WDT does_VBZ not_RB separate_VB church_NN and_CC state_NN (_( ha-ha_JJ )_) ,_, she_PRP ca_MD n't_RB recall_VB the_DT 14th_JJ and_CC 16th_JJ amendments_NNS and_CC needs_VBZ to_TO be_VB refreshed_JJ by_IN the_DT questioner_NN ._. 

That_DT 's_VBZ the_DT real_JJ "_'' busted_JJ !_. "_'' moment_NN here_RB ,_, if_IN you_PRP ask_VBP me_PRP ._. 

For_IN people_NNS who_WP speak_VBP so_RB militantly_RB about_IN adhering_VBG to_TO the_DT constitution_NN ,_, I_PRP expect_VBP a_DT military_NN like_IN response_NN to_TO such_JJ a_DT simple_JJ question_NN ._. 

Wingnuts_NNP will_MD turn_VB blue_JJ arguing_VBG about_IN a_DT Christian_NNP nation_NN and_CC constitution_NN ,_, but_CC not_RB knowing_VBG two_CD amendments_NNS ,_, as_IN a_DT person_NN running_VBG to_TO uphold_VB and_CC defend_VB the_DT constitution_NN containing_VBG those_DT amendments_NNS ,_, this_DT clip_NN exposes_NNS her_PRP$ and_CC the_DT Tea_NNP Party_NNP faithful_NN as_IN constitutional_JJ frauds_NNS ._. 

Not_RB knowing_VBG what_WP the_DT constitution_NN says_VBZ when_WRB asked_VBN is_VBZ bold_JJ font_NN black_NN over_IN white_NN ._. 
There_EX 's_VBZ no_DT grey_JJ area_NN ,_, here_RB ._. 

As_IN a_DT defender_NN ,_, you_PRP can_MD say_VB ,_, "_'' well_RB ,_, she_PRP believes_VBZ church_NN and_CC state_NN are_VBP indivisible_JJ ,_, so_RB do_VBP I._NN "_'' But_CC you_PRP ca_MD n't_RB say_VB she_PRP knows_VBZ the_DT constitution_NN when_WRB she_PRP clearly_RB does_VBZ not_RB ._. 

As_IN someone_NN trying_VBG to_TO get_VB a_DT government_NN job_NN with_IN great_JJ benefits_NNS where_WRB the_DT qualification_NN is_VBZ basically_RB ,_, "_'' take_VB this_DT constitution_NN and_CC defend_VB it_PRP with_IN your_PRP$ life_NN ,_, "_'' Tea_NNP Party_NNP Republicans_NNPS spend_VBP an_DT awful_JJ lot_NN of_IN time_NN tearing_VBG it_PRP up_RP and_CC reassembling_VBG the_DT pieces_NNS to_TO their_PRP$ acquired_JJ tastes_NNS ._. 

Her_PRP$ argument_NN dismissing_VBG the_DT separation_NN of_IN church_NN and_CC state_NN is_VBZ dessert_NN before_IN dinner_NN ._. 

Slightly_RB off-topic_JJ ,_, I_PRP 've_VBP been_VBN spending_VBG a_DT lot_NN of_IN time_NN on_IN potential_JJ swing_NN vote_NN forums_NNS adding_VBG fact_NN to_TO fiction_NN ._. 
It_PRP 's_VBZ hilarious_JJ when_WRB republicans_NNS who_WP voted_VBD for_IN Bush_NNP twice_RB and_CC approved_VBD the_DT majority_NN of_IN the_DT way_NN through_IN (_( approval_NN among_IN republicans_NNS was_VBD pretty_RB consistent_JJ )_) are_VBP telling_VBG me_PRP about_IN all_PDT the_DT mistakes_NNS Obama_NNP makes_VBZ and_CC imparting_VBG their_PRP$ Bush-loving_NNP "_'' wisdom_NN "_'' to_TO those_DT less_RBR in-the-know_JJ ._. 

If_IN you_PRP think_VBP Bush_NNP was_VBD good_JJ enough_RB to_TO vote_VB for_IN twice_RB ,_, and_CC you_PRP 're_VBP one_CD of_IN the_DT 60_CD million_CD McCain_NNP /_NN Palin_NNP people_NNS ,_, your_PRP$ qualifications_NNS and_CC insight_NN ,_, like_IN Christine_NNP O_NNP '_POS Donnell_NNP 's_POS ,_, are_VBP comical_JJ at_IN best_JJS ._. 

Make_VB no_DT mistake_NN ,_, I_PRP 'm_VBP laughing_VBG AT_NNP you_PRP ,_, Tea_NNP Party_NNP Republican_JJ people_NNS ._. 

Posted_VBN by_IN :_: MrBrink_NNP at_IN October_NNP 19_CD ,_, 2010_CD 5:50_NN PM_NNP 
If_IN the_DT laughter_NN was_VBD with_IN her_PRP$ ,_, then_RB the_DT joke_NN is_VBZ on_IN everyone_NN there_RB in_IN support_NN ,_, of_IN course_NN ,_, because_IN moments_NNS later_RB ,_, after_IN she_PRP 's_VBZ basically_RB pounding_VBG the_DT desk_NN talking_VBG about_IN the_DT constitution_NN and_CC her_PRP$ unyielding_VBG devotion_NN to_TO that_DT which_WDT does_VBZ not_RB separate_VB church_NN and_CC state_NN (_( ha-ha_JJ )_) ,_, she_PRP ca_MD n't_RB recall_VB the_DT 14th_JJ and_CC 16th_JJ amendments_NNS and_CC needs_VBZ to_TO be_VB refreshed_JJ by_IN the_DT questioner_NN ._. 

That_DT 's_VBZ the_DT real_JJ "_'' busted_JJ !_. "_'' moment_NN here_RB ,_, if_IN you_PRP ask_VBP me_PRP ._. 

For_IN people_NNS who_WP speak_VBP so_RB militantly_RB about_IN adhering_VBG to_TO the_DT constitution_NN ,_, I_PRP expect_VBP a_DT military_NN like_IN response_NN to_TO such_JJ a_DT simple_JJ question_NN ._. 

Wingnuts_NNP will_MD turn_VB blue_JJ arguing_VBG about_IN a_DT Christian_NNP nation_NN and_CC constitution_NN ,_, but_CC not_RB knowing_VBG two_CD amendments_NNS ,_, as_IN a_DT person_NN running_VBG to_TO uphold_VB and_CC defend_VB the_DT constitution_NN containing_VBG those_DT amendments_NNS ,_, this_DT clip_NN exposes_NNS her_PRP$ and_CC the_DT Tea_NNP Party_NNP faithful_NN as_IN constitutional_JJ frauds_NNS ._. 

Not_RB knowing_VBG what_WP the_DT constitution_NN says_VBZ when_WRB asked_VBN is_VBZ bold_JJ font_NN black_NN over_IN white_NN ._. 
There_EX 's_VBZ no_DT grey_JJ area_NN ,_, here_RB ._. 

As_IN a_DT defender_NN ,_, you_PRP can_MD say_VB ,_, "_'' well_RB ,_, she_PRP believes_VBZ church_NN and_CC state_NN are_VBP indivisible_JJ ,_, so_RB do_VBP I._NN "_'' But_CC you_PRP ca_MD n't_RB say_VB she_PRP knows_VBZ the_DT constitution_NN when_WRB she_PRP clearly_RB does_VBZ not_RB ._. 

As_IN someone_NN trying_VBG to_TO get_VB a_DT government_NN job_NN with_IN great_JJ benefits_NNS where_WRB the_DT qualification_NN is_VBZ basically_RB ,_, "_'' take_VB this_DT constitution_NN and_CC defend_VB it_PRP with_IN your_PRP$ life_NN ,_, "_'' Tea_NNP Party_NNP Republicans_NNPS spend_VBP an_DT awful_JJ lot_NN of_IN time_NN tearing_VBG it_PRP up_RP and_CC reassembling_VBG the_DT pieces_NNS to_TO their_PRP$ acquired_JJ tastes_NNS ._. 

Her_PRP$ argument_NN dismissing_VBG the_DT separation_NN of_IN church_NN and_CC state_NN is_VBZ dessert_NN before_IN dinner_NN ._. 

Slightly_RB off-topic_JJ ,_, I_PRP 've_VBP been_VBN spending_VBG a_DT lot_NN of_IN time_NN on_IN potential_JJ swing_NN vote_NN forums_NNS adding_VBG fact_NN to_TO fiction_NN ._. 
It_PRP 's_VBZ hilarious_JJ when_WRB republicans_NNS who_WP voted_VBD for_IN Bush_NNP twice_RB and_CC approved_VBD the_DT majority_NN of_IN the_DT way_NN through_IN (_( approval_NN among_IN republicans_NNS was_VBD pretty_RB consistent_JJ )_) are_VBP telling_VBG me_PRP about_IN all_PDT the_DT mistakes_NNS Obama_NNP makes_VBZ and_CC imparting_VBG their_PRP$ Bush-loving_NNP "_'' wisdom_NN "_'' to_TO those_DT less_RBR in-the-know_JJ ._. 

If_IN you_PRP think_VBP Bush_NNP was_VBD good_JJ enough_RB to_TO vote_VB for_IN twice_RB ,_, and_CC you_PRP 're_VBP one_CD of_IN the_DT 60_CD million_CD McCain_NNP /_NN Palin_NNP people_NNS ,_, your_PRP$ qualifications_NNS and_CC insight_NN ,_, like_IN Christine_NNP O_NNP '_POS Donnell_NNP 's_POS ,_, are_VBP comical_JJ at_IN best_JJS ._. 

Make_VB no_DT mistake_NN ,_, I_PRP 'm_VBP laughing_VBG AT_NNP you_PRP ,_, Tea_NNP Party_NNP Republican_JJ people_NNS ._. 

Posted_VBN by_IN :_: MrBrink_NNP at_IN October_NNP 19_CD ,_, 2010_CD 5:50_NN PM_NNP 
Oh_UH ,_, double-post_JJ ._. 
Why_WRB do_VBP you_PRP taunt_NN my_PRP$ caffeinated_JJ clicky_NN finger_NN ?_. 

Posted_VBN by_IN :_: MrBrink_NNP at_IN October_NNP 19_CD ,_, 2010_CD 5:53_NN PM_NNP 
Oh_UH ,_, double-post_JJ ._. 
Why_WRB do_VBP you_PRP taunt_NN my_PRP$ caffeinated_JJ clicky_NN finger_NN ?_. 

Posted_VBN by_IN :_: MrBrink_NNP at_IN October_NNP 19_CD ,_, 2010_CD 5:53_NN PM_NNP 
I_PRP have_VBP to_TO agree_VB with_IN Pea_NNP and_CC Nicole_NNP ..._... you_PRP can_MD clearly_RB hear_VB a_DT man_NN 's_POS voice_NN say_VBP "_'' Oh_UH my_PRP$ god_NN "_'' after_IN O_NNP '_POS Donnell_NNP says_VBZ that_IN and_CC his_PRP$ tone_NN is_VBZ "_'' I_PRP ca_MD n't_RB believe_VB she_PRP said_VBD something_NN so_RB incredibly_RB stupid_JJ "_'' ._. 
Yeah_UH ,_, they_PRP were_VBD laughing_VBG at_IN her_PRP$ ,_, as_IN is_VBZ appropriate_JJ ._. 

Posted_VBN by_IN :_: Irish_NNP Girl_NNP at_IN October_NNP 19_CD ,_, 2010_CD 5:53_NN PM_NNP 
It_PRP 's_VBZ beyond_IN frustrating_JJ to_TO me_PRP ,_, as_IN someone_NN who_WP has_VBZ studied_VBN Constitutional_NNP Law_NNP ,_, who_WP competed_VBD on_IN the_DT the_DT national_JJ level_NN on_IN it_PRP in_IN law_NN school_NN ,_, and_CC who_WP published_VBD an_DT article_NN on_IN it_PRP ,_, to_TO hear_VB people_NNS who_WP clearly_RB have_VBP n't_RB done_VBN the_DT first_JJ of_IN these_DT talk_NN about_IN it_PRP as_IN if_IN they_PRP know_VBP better_JJR than_IN I_PRP do_VBP what_WP the_DT Constitution_NNP says_VBZ ,_, means_VBZ ,_, and_CC is_VBZ all_DT about_IN ._. 

I_PRP had_VBD a_DT TPer_NNP over_IN at_IN HuffPo_NNP tell_VB me_PRP I_PRP did_VBD n't_RB know_VB what_WP I_PRP was_VBD talking_VBG about_IN vis-à-vis_JJ the_DT need_NN for_IN Constitutional_NNP interpretation_NN and_CC Constitutional_NNP Law_NNP (_( he_PRP believed_VBD that_IN any_DT and_CC all_DT Constitutional_NNP questions_NNS must_MD and_CC can_MD only_RB be_VB resolved_VBN by_IN Amendment_NNP ,_, not_RB by_IN judicial_JJ review_NN )_) ,_, before_IN proudly_RB proclaiming_VBG that_IN he_PRP had_VBD never_RB gone_VBN to_TO law_NN school_NN and_CC "_'' despise_VB [_NN d_SYM ]_NN the_DT legal_JJ profession_NN ._. 
"_'' 
Where_WRB do_VBP you_PRP go_VBP from_IN there_RB ?_. 

Posted_VBN by_IN :_: GrafZeppelin_NNP 127_CD at_IN October_NNP 19_CD ,_, 2010_CD 6:41_NN PM_NNP 
I_PRP thinks_VBZ this_DT illustrates_VBZ their_PRP$ biblical_JJ view_NN of_IN the_DT Constitution_NNP ,_, and_CC by_IN that_IN I_PRP mean_VBP they_PRP regard_VBP it_PRP the_DT same_JJ way_NN as_IN they_PRP regard_VBP the_DT Holy_NNP Bible_NNP ._. 
It_PRP 's_VBZ a_DT document_NN that_WDT is_VBZ not_RB to_TO be_VB questioned_VBN ,_, but_CC merely_RB followed_VBN to_TO the_DT letter_NN because_IN it_PRP was_VBD handed_VBN down_RB to_TO us_PRP by_IN greater_JJR beings_NNS ._. 
Oh_UH ,_, and_CC like_IN the_DT Holy_NNP Bible_NNP ,_, that_IN we_PRP mere_JJ mortals_NNS are_VBP not_RB supposed_VBN to_TO question_VB or_CC interpret_VB ,_, they_PRP 'll_MD let_VB us_PRP know_VB what_WP it_PRP really_RB means_VBZ and_CC that_DT will_MD often_RB conflict_NN with_IN what_WP it_PRP actually_RB says_VBZ ._. 

They_PRP try_VBP to_TO exert_VB some_DT sort_NN of_IN control_NN over_IN it_PRP 's_VBZ meaning_VBG by_IN elevating_VBG it_PRP to_TO a_DT level_NN that_WDT makes_VBZ it_PRP untouchable_JJ ._. 
To_TO them_PRP it_PRP 's_VBZ not_RB a_DT living_VBG document_NN that_WDT was_VBD designed_VBN to_TO change_VB with_IN the_DT nation_NN ,_, but_CC essentially_RB carved_VBN in_IN stone_NN like_IN the_DT Ten_CD Commandments_NNP ._. 
Immutable_NNP and_CC unchanging_JJ ._. 
Except_IN for_IN ,_, you_PRP know_VBP ,_, maybe_RB an_DT amendment_NN barring_VBG gay_JJ marriage_NN ._. 
But_CC in_IN order_NN to_TO regain_VB some_DT control_NN over_IN their_PRP$ lives_NNS that_IN they_PRP firmly_RB believe_VBP they_PRP 've_VBP lost_VBN ,_, they_PRP 're_VBP now_RB trying_VBG to_TO determine_VB ,_, with_IN unwavering_VBG certainty_NN ,_, that_IN we_PRP 've_VBP all_DT been_VBN doing_VBG this_DT wrong_JJ the_DT whole_JJ time_NN and_CC if_IN we_PRP just_RB get_VBP back_RB to_TO what_WP the_DT founders_NNS wanted_VBD ,_, everything_NN will_MD be_VB ok_JJ ._. 

Give_VB 'em_PRP a_DT few_JJ minutes_NNS ,_, though_RB ._. 
They_PRP 're_VBP waiting_VBG on_IN an_DT email_NN reply_NN from_IN the_DT Washington_NNP re-enacter_JJ at_IN Arlington_NNP to_TO hand_VB down_RP some_DT decisions_NNS ._. 

Posted_VBN by_IN :_: Nanotyrannus_NNP at_IN October_NNP 19_CD ,_, 2010_CD 7:19_NN PM_NNP 
@_IN GrafZeppellin_NNP 127_CD 
In_IN answer_NN to_TO your_PRP$ question_NN --_: where_WRB do_VBP you_PRP go_VBP from_IN there_RB ?_. 
I_PRP 've_VBP recently_RB come_VB to_TO the_DT conclusion_NN that_IN the_DT answer_NN is_VBZ "_'' nowhere_RB "_'' ._. 
I_PRP used_VBD to_TO be_VB against_IN making_VBG blanket_NN statements_NNS about_IN the_DT hard_JJ core_NN tea_NN partiers_NNS ,_, like_IN the_DT person_NN you_PRP described_VBD ..._... "_'' they_PRP 're_VBP not_RB all_DT crazy_JJ "_'' "_'' they_PRP 're_VBP not_RB all_DT hateful_JJ "_'' but_CC lately_RB ,_, i_NNP 'm_VBP over_IN it_PRP ._. 

they_PRP do_VBP n't_RB believe_VB in_IN :_: evolution_NN ,_, climate_NN change_NN ,_, the_DT dept_NN of_IN education_NN ,_, public_JJ education_NN ,_, taxes_NNS in_IN order_NN to_TO pay_VB for_IN roads_NNS /_NN police_NN and_CC firemen_NNS ._. 
they_PRP believe_VBP the_DT President_NNP is_VBZ not_RB an_DT American_NNP ._. 
they_PRP see_VBP no_DT problem_NN with_IN racism_NN ,_, sexism_NN and_CC fascism_NN ._. 
they_PRP do_VBP n't_RB understand_VB that_IN "_'' freedom_NN of_IN speech_NN "_'' does_VBZ n't_RB mean_VB freedom_NN from_IN consequences_NNS ._. 
they_PRP confuse_VB losing_VBG an_DT election_NN with_IN tyranny_NN ._. 
they_PRP horde_NN food_NN because_IN glenn_NN beck_NN told_VBD them_PRP so_RB --_: they_PRP conflate_NN their_PRP$ "_'' movement_NN "_'' with_IN the_DT civil_JJ rights_NNS movement_NN --_: they_PRP "_'' detain_NN "_'' reporters_NNS ,_, on_IN public_JJ property_NN ,_, for_IN the_DT crime_NN of_IN asking_VBG questions_NNS ..._... 

you_PRP do_VBP n't_RB reason_VB with_IN people_NNS who_WP believe_VBP these_DT things_NNS ,_, any_DT more_JJR than_IN you_PRP 'd_MD try_VB to_TO reason_VB with_IN charles_NNS manson_NN ._. 
they_PRP 're_VBP crazy_JJ --_: plain_JJ and_CC simple_JJ and_CC it_PRP 's_VBZ really_RB ,_, really_RB sad_JJ ._. 

Posted_VBN by_IN :_: mslarry_NN 1973_CD at_IN October_NNP 19_CD ,_, 2010_CD 7:23_NN PM_NNP 
@_IN ELDING_NNP -_: Have_VBP to_TO disagree_VB ,_, buddy_NN ._. 
The_DT debate_NN was_VBD at_IN Widener_NNP Law_NNP School_NNP ._. 
They_PRP laughed_VBD at_IN her_PRP$ the_DT second_JJ time_NN as_RB well_RB when_WRB she_PRP incredulously_RB asked_VBD ,_, as_IN if_IN not_RB believing_VBG Coons_NNP ,_, "_'' That_DT 's_VBZ in_IN the_DT First_CD Amendment_NNP ?_. 
"_'' 
I_PRP do_VBP n't_RB think_VB they_PRP were_VBD laughing_VBG at_IN him_PRP ._. 
If_IN they_PRP were_VBD ,_, they_PRP 'd_MD be_VB reacting_VBG after_IN his_PRP$ comment_NN (_( and_CC probably_RB booing_VBG and_CC calling_VBG him_PRP a_DT liar_NN )_) rather_RB than_IN reacting_VBG after_IN her_PRP$ comment_NN ._. 

Posted_VBN by_IN :_: Broadway_NNP Carl_NNP at_IN October_NNP 19_CD ,_, 2010_CD 7:23_NN PM_NNP 
@_IN Irish_NNP Girl_NNP ....._. so_RB good_JJ to_TO see_VB you_PRP !_. !_. 
I_PRP hope_VBP you_PRP 're_VBP well_RB ._. 
:_: )_) 
Posted_VBN by_IN :_: Nicole_NNP 473_CD at_IN October_NNP 19_CD ,_, 2010_CD 7:59_NN PM_NNP 
GrafZeppelin_NNP :_: 
I_PRP had_VBD a_DT TPer_NNP over_IN at_IN HuffPo_NNP tell_VB me_PRP I_PRP did_VBD n't_RB know_VB what_WP I_PRP was_VBD talking_VBG about_IN vis-à-vis_JJ the_DT need_NN for_IN Constitutional_NNP interpretation_NN and_CC Constitutional_NNP Law_NNP (_( he_PRP believed_VBD that_IN any_DT and_CC all_DT Constitutional_NNP questions_NNS must_MD and_CC can_MD only_RB be_VB resolved_VBN by_IN Amendment_NNP ,_, not_RB by_IN judicial_JJ review_NN )_) ,_, before_IN proudly_RB proclaiming_VBG that_IN he_PRP had_VBD never_RB gone_VBN to_TO law_NN school_NN and_CC "_'' despise_VB [_NN d_SYM ]_NN the_DT legal_JJ profession_NN ._. 
"_'' There_EX is_VBZ nowhere_RB to_TO go_VB with_IN these_DT ignoramuses_NNS ._. 
They_PRP would_MD not_RB believe_VB you_PRP if_IN you_PRP parted_VBD the_DT sea_NN for_IN them_PRP first_JJ ._. 
I_PRP learned_VBD my_PRP$ lesson_NN at_IN HP_NNP ._. 
While_IN it_PRP can_MD be_VB personally_RB satisfying_VBG to_TO present_VB all_DT your_PRP$ little_JJ ducks_NNS in_IN a_DT row_NN ,_, they_PRP will_MD never_RB stop_VB erroneously_RB knocking_VBG the_DT damn_JJ ducks_VBZ out_IN of_IN line_NN ._. 

Posted_VBN by_IN :_: Nicole_NNP 473_CD at_IN October_NNP 19_CD ,_, 2010_CD 8:02_NN PM_NNP 
You_PRP know_VBP she_PRP had_VBD better_JJR watch_NN out_RP !_. 
The_DT separation_NN between_IN church_NN and_CC state_NN is_VBZ what_WP saves_VBZ us_PRP from_IN SHARIA_NNP LAW_NNP !_. 
I_PRP think_VBP those_DT trying_VBG to_TO diminish_VB the_DT separation_NN are_VBP probably_RB secret_JJ Muslim_NNP sympathizers_NNS that_WDT are_VBP sneaking_VBG SHARIA_NNP LAW_NNP in_IN on_IN us_PRP !_. 

Posted_VBN by_IN :_: Ron_NNP Spridgen_NNP at_IN October_NNP 19_CD ,_, 2010_CD 8:17_NN PM_NNP 
Nah_NNP ,_, I_PRP 'm_VBP convinced_VBN that_IN the_DT audible_JJ gasps_NNS and_CC stifled_JJ chuckles_NNS were_VBD from_IN her_PRP$ attempt_NN to_TO bluff_NN her_PRP$ way_NN through_IN an_DT exchange_NN regarding_VBG the_DT Constitution_NNP in_IN a_DT room_NN full_JJ of_IN lawyers_NNS ._. 

Performance_NN art_NN ,_, people_NNS ._. 

She_PRP 's_VBZ not_RB running_VBG to_TO win_VB ,_, and_CC if_IN you_PRP think_VBP she_PRP is_VBZ ,_, you_PRP 're_VBP not_RB paying_VBG attention_NN ._. 

Posted_VBN by_IN :_: Lexaburn_NNP at_IN October_NNP 19_CD ,_, 2010_CD 10:58_NN PM_NNP 
Think_VBP of_IN those_DT Bill_NNP Maher_NNP clips_NNS ._. 
The_DT constant_JJ television_NN appearances_NNS for_IN the_DT last_JJ decade_NN or_CC so_RB ._. 
Think_VBP of_IN who_WP endorsed_VBD her_PRP$ ,_, and_CC how_WRB O_NNP '_POS Donnell_NNP could_MD teach_VB her_PRP$ a_DT thing_NN or_CC two_CD about_IN ..._... moderate_JJ ad-libbing._NN 

The_DT strategy_NN is_VBZ this_DT :_: be_VB as_RB foolish_JJ as_IN possible_JJ ,_, so_IN no_DT one_CD anticipates_VBZ you_PRP actually_RB knowing_VBG anything_NN ._. 
Embrace_NNP the_DT derision_NN and_CC /_NN or_CC ridicule_NN ._. 
Go_VB on_IN the_DT circuit_NN as_IN a_DT passionate_JJ advocate_NN for_IN whatever_WDT cause_VBP you_PRP choose_VB to_TO co-opt_JJ ._. 
In_IN O_NNP '_POS Donnell_NNP 's_POS case_NN it_PRP 's_VBZ the_DT same_JJ pseudo-_NN Christianity_NNP holy_JJ rollers_NNS dignify_VB to_TO play_VB within_IN the_DT political_JJ arena_NN ._. 
In_IN Palin_NNP 's_POS case_NN ,_, it_PRP 's_VBZ the_DT crypto-fascism_JJ that_IN oozes_NNS within_IN the_DT GOP_NNP ._. 
The_DT Teapublicans_NNP fool_NN no_DT one_CD with_IN their_PRP$ talk_NN of_IN independence_NN and_CC the_DT theatrical_JJ in-fighting_JJ ._. 
They_PRP always_RB tame_JJ those_DT they_PRP let_VBP in_IN their_PRP$ ranks_NNS or_CC they_PRP destroy_VBP them_PRP ._. 
Palin_NNP knows_VBZ her_PRP$ place_NN ,_, as_IN do_VBP they_PRP all_DT ._. 

Do_VBP you_PRP really_RB think_VBP a_DT serious_JJ candidate_NN would_MD go_VB around_IN asking_VBG for_IN hints_NNS during_IN a_DT debate_NN ?_. 
Seriously_NNP !_. 
O_NNP '_POS Donnell_NNP is_VBZ not_RB that_DT stupid_JJ ._. 
I_PRP know_VBP some_DT of_IN you_PRP want_VBP to_TO think_VB she_PRP is_VBZ for_IN the_DT sake_NN of_IN mirth_NN and_CC merriment_NN ,_, but_CC she_PRP ai_VBP n't_RB ._. 
Sorry_JJ ._. 
Just_RB like_IN Palin_NNP is_VBZ n't_RB stupid_JJ enough_RB to_TO confuse_VB PA_NNP with_IN WV_NNP ._. 
Poke_NNP fun_NN all_DT you_PRP want_VBP ,_, but_CC at_IN least_JJS be_VB realistic_JJ with_IN yourselves_PRP :_: you_PRP have_VBP just_RB as_IN much_JJ fun_NN as_IN they_PRP 're_VBP having_VBG ._. 

Trust_NNP me_PRP ,_, y_NN '_'' all_DT ,_, they_PRP are_VBP faking_VBG it_PRP !_. 

O_NNP '_POS Donnell_NNP 's_POS running_NN on_IN personality_NN alone_RB ,_, nothing_NN more_JJR ,_, nothing_NN less_RBR ._. 
Regarding_VBG politics_NNS ,_, she_PRP 's_VBZ a_DT glorified_JJ booster_NN ,_, same_JJ as_IN with_IN Mangle_NNP in_IN Nevada_NNP ._. 
Lowden_NNP the_DT chicken-lady_JJ and_CC Mangle_NNP were_VBD merely_RB supposed_VBN to_TO challenge_VB and_CC beat_VB Reid_NNP ,_, then_RB get_VB out_IN of_IN the_DT way_NN ._. 
O_NNP '_POS Donnell_NNP is_VBZ to_TO be_VB a_DT face_NN for_IN the_DT underdog_NN teabaggers_NNS ._. 
This_DT is_VBZ why_WRB they_PRP 're_VBP not_RB making_VBG a_DT full_JJ investment_NN in_IN her_PRP ._. 
Her_PRP$ place_NN is_VBZ not_RB in_IN the_DT senate_NN ,_, but_CC on_IN television_NN ._. 

Posted_VBN by_IN :_: Lexaburn_NNP at_IN October_NNP 19_CD ,_, 2010_CD 11:17_NN PM_NNP 
Elvis_NNP ,_, having_VBG watching_VBG the_DT video_NN several_JJ times_NNS ,_, I_PRP have_VBP to_TO disagree_VB ._. 
The_DT audience_NN was_VBD clearly_RB laughing_VBG at_IN her_PRP$ and_CC her_PRP$ ignorance_NN ._. 
However_RB ,_, she_PRP clearly_RB thinks_VBZ she_PRP that_IN she_PRP has_VBZ scored_VBN a_DT huge_JJ win_NN and_CC that_IN the_DT audience_NN was_VBD on_IN her_PRP$ side_NN ._. 

Just_RB more_JJR of_IN her_PRP$ complete_JJ separation_NN from_IN reality_NN ._. 

Posted_VBN by_IN :_: DC_NNP at_IN October_NNP 19_CD ,_, 2010_CD 11:23_NN PM_NNP 
Oh_UH ,_, and_CC ELDING_NNP ,_, their_PRP$ reaction_NN stems_VBZ from_IN the_DT fact_NN that_IN she_PRP broached_JJ the_DT subject_NN again_RB after_IN the_DT moderator_NN moved_VBD on_IN ._. 
Her_PRP$ question_NN was_VBD the_DT equivalent_NN of_IN asking_VBG "_'' Where_WRB 're_VBP the_DT pictures_NNS ?_. 
"_'' when_WRB staring_VBG at_IN the_DT document_NN ,_, especially_RB in_IN that_DT setting_VBG ._. 

She_PRP did_VBD it_PRP on_IN purpose_NN ,_, not_RB to_TO further_VB the_DT discussion_NN ,_, but_CC to_TO establish_VB that_RB ,_, yes_UH ,_, she_PRP is_VBZ a_DT dependable_JJ dumbass_NNS ._. 

I_PRP 'm_VBP telling_VBG you_PRP all_DT ,_, she_PRP 's_VBZ running_VBG a_DT game_NN ._. 

Posted_VBN by_IN :_: Lexaburn_NNP at_IN October_NNP 19_CD ,_, 2010_CD 11:24_NN PM_NNP 
Lexaburn_NNP ,_, I_PRP have_VBP to_TO disagree_VB with_IN your_PRP$ assessment_NN that_IN this_DT is_VBZ all_PDT a_DT game_NN and_CC that_IN she_PRP 's_VBZ not_RB that_DT dumb_JJ ._. 
I_PRP do_VBP n't_RB believe_VB she_PRP 's_VBZ as_RB dumb_JJ as_IN she_PRP is_VBZ ignorant_NN ._. 
It_PRP if_IN really_RB is_VBZ a_DT game_NN for_IN O_NNP '_POS Donnell_NNP ,_, then_RB what_WP 's_VBZ the_DT end_NN game_NN ?_. 
She_PRP may_MD have_VB flown_VBN under_IN the_DT radar_NN for_IN her_PRP$ previous_JJ campaigns_NNS ,_, but_CC now_RB she_PRP 's_VBZ made_VBN herself_PRP a_DT fool_NN in_IN the_DT national_JJ spotlight_NN and_CC effectively_RB ruined_VBN any_DT chance_NN of_IN continuing_VBG her_PRP$ charade_NN ,_, if_IN her_PRP$ intention_NN was_VBD to_TO be_VB a_DT lifelong_JJ nominee_NN in_IN the_DT first_JJ place_NN ._. 

Being_VBG a_DT perpetual_JJ campaigner_NN can_MD only_RB get_VB you_PRP so_RB far_RB ,_, and_CC if_IN they_PRP do_VBP n't_RB intend_VB to_TO win_VB after_IN getting_VBG the_DT nomination_NN ,_, then_RB that_IN con_JJ game_NN is_VBZ limited_VBN ._. 

Maybe_RB Palin_NNP fits_VBZ more_JJR into_IN the_DT realm_NN of_IN your_PRP$ assessment_NN ,_, but_CC if_IN she_PRP runs_VBZ and_CC loses_VBZ in_IN 2012_CD ,_, her_PRP$ shelf_NN life_NN is_VBZ limited_VBN too_RB ._. 

Posted_VBN by_IN :_: Broadway_NNP Carl_NNP at_IN October_NNP 20_CD ,_, 2010_CD 12:29_NN AM_NNP 
@_IN Nicole_NNP ,_, hi_NN !_. It_PRP 's_VBZ good_JJ to_TO be_VB back_RB ._. 
I_PRP 've_VBP been_VBN awol_NN due_JJ to_TO having_VBG a_DT baby_NN ...._. little_JJ Liam_NNP was_VBD born_VBN on_IN 9/21_CD (_( a_DT couple_NN of_IN weeks_NNS early_JJ but_CC he_PRP 's_VBZ doing_VBG well_RB )_) ._. 
Thank_VB goodness_NN for_IN FMLA_NNP and_CC maternity_NN leave_NN ._. 

Posted_VBN by_IN :_: Irish_NNP Girl_NNP at_IN October_NNP 20_CD ,_, 2010_CD 1:08_NN AM_NNP 
BC_NNP ,_, you_PRP misunderstand_NN me_PRP ._. 
I_PRP 'm_VBP not_RB saying_VBG she_PRP knows_VBZ a_DT damned_RB thing_NN about_IN the_DT Constitution_NNP ._. 
In_IN fact_NN ,_, I_PRP 'd_MD go_VB a_DT far_RB as_IN to_TO say_VB she_PRP does_VBZ n't_RB give_VB one_CD damn_RB about_IN it_PRP ._. 
What_WP I_PRP 'm_VBP saying_VBG is_VBZ that_IN going_VBG into_IN these_DT discussions_NNS ,_, she_PRP 's_VBZ fully_RB aware_JJ of_IN her_PRP$ deficiencies_NNS ._. 
To_TO tell_VB the_DT truth_NN ,_, I_PRP ca_MD n't_RB tell_VB you_PRP her_PRP$ actual_JJ "_'' endgame_NN ,_, "_'' per_IN se_FW ,_, but_CC if_IN I_PRP had_VBD a_DT guess_NN it_PRP would_MD be_VB an_DT extended_JJ stint_NN on_IN a_DT cable_NN news_NN channel_NN ._. 

The_DT "_'' shelf_NN life_NN "_'' of_IN both_DT women_NNS is_VBZ only_RB limited_VBN to_TO the_DT fraction_NN with_IN which_WDT they_PRP uphold_VB a_DT standard_NN ._. 
Palin_NNP took_VBD standards_NNS out_IN of_IN the_DT equation_NN when_WRB she_PRP quit_VBD her_PRP$ job_NN ._. 
Were_VBD she_PRP to_TO actually_RB run_VB ,_, it_PRP would_MD be_VB for_IN vanity_NN 's_POS sake_NN ._. 
She_PRP 's_VBZ reaching_VBG for_IN what_WP O_NNP '_POS Donnell_NNP has_VBZ already_RB achieved_VBN ._. 
They_PRP 've_VBP both_DT lowered_VBN themselves_PRP to_TO being_VBG cheerleaders_NNS for_IN so-called_JJ "_'' conservative_JJ "_'' causes_NNS ._. 
Well_RB ,_, Palin_NNP did_VBD anyway_RB ._. 

I_PRP attribute_VBP part_NN of_IN my_PRP$ assessment_NN of_IN O_NNP '_POS Donnell_NNP to_TO info_NN I_PRP 've_VBP gleaned_VBN from_IN a_DT good_JJ friend_NN of_IN mine_NN that_WDT knew_VBD her_PRP on_IN the_DT media_NNS circuit_NN at_IN the_DT start_NN of_IN the_DT decade_NN ._. 
My_PRP$ friend_NN describes_VBZ her_PRP as_RB a_DT "_'' bad_JJ actress_NN "_'' primarily_RB ,_, that_IN co-opts_JJ "_'' conservativism_NN ,_, "_'' but_CC does_VBZ n't_RB necessarily_RB cling_VB to_TO it_PRP as_IN some_DT may_MD believe_VB ._. 
This_DT friend_NN tells_VBZ me_PRP that_IN Christine_NNP does_VBZ n't_RB believe_VB half_NN provocative_JJ and_CC /_NN or_CC boneheaded_JJ things_NNS she_PRP 's_VBZ saying_VBG ._. 
O_NNP '_POS Donnell_NNP is_VBZ described_VBN as_IN a_DT normal_JJ conservative_JJ Republican_JJ woman_NN by_IN my_PRP$ friend_NN ._. 
I_PRP am_VBP convinced_VBN personally_RB that_IN O_NNP '_POS Donnell_NNP 's_POS just_RB a_DT starved_JJ media_NNS personality_NN that_WDT found_VBD a_DT new_JJ gimmick_NN in_IN running_VBG for_IN public_JJ office_NN ._. 
That_DT is_VBZ the_DT lifestyle_NN choice_NN she_PRP has_VBZ made_VBN ,_, and_CC she_PRP 's_VBZ sticking_VBG with_IN it_PRP ._. 
Some_DT of_IN the_DT innuendo_NN surrounding_VBG her_PRP$ leads_NNS me_PRP to_TO this_DT conclusion_NN ,_, as_RB well_RB ._. 
However_RB ,_, I_PRP ca_MD n't_RB be_VB too_RB conclusive_JJ ..._... 

You_PRP know_VBP what_WP ,_, I_PRP 'm_VBP being_VBG too_RB much_JJ of_IN a_DT stuffy_JJ doctor_NN ._. 

Anyway_RB ,_, that_DT smile_NN she_PRP gives_VBZ after_IN asking_VBG about_IN the_DT 1st_CD Amendment_NNP may_MD very_RB well_RB be_VB her_PRP$ being_VBG in_IN on_IN the_DT joke_NN she_PRP 's_VBZ making_NN of_IN herself_PRP ._. 
It_PRP 's_VBZ not_RB the_DT fact_NN that_IN she_PRP tried_VBD and_CC failed_VBD to_TO dictate_VB content_NN within_IN a_DT Constitutional_NNP Amendment_NNP ;_: it_PRP 's_VBZ the_DT fact_NN that_IN she_PRP knew_VBD she_PRP did_VBD not_RB know_VB and_CC said_VBD what_WP she_PRP said_VBD regardless_RB ._. 
Do_VBP not_RB try_VB to_TO make_VB sense_NN out_IN of_IN anything_NN of_IN this_DT if_IN you_PRP 're_VBP not_RB thinking_VBG like_IN a_DT ..._... celebrity_NN of_IN whatever_WDT quality_NN ,_, let_VB 's_POS say_NN ._. 

Here_RB 's_POS what_WP you_PRP do_VBP :_: gather_VB all_PDT the_DT O_NNP '_POS Donnell_NNP appearances_NNS that_IN you_PRP can_MD from_IN online_NN sources_NNS ._. 
Go_VB through_IN all_DT ,_, and_CC see_VB if_IN her_PRP$ point_NN of_IN view_NN EVER_NNP evolves_NNS beyond_IN the_DT con-servative_JJ blather_NN or_CC the_DT crank_VB conspiracy_NN theories_NNS ._. 
Next_JJ ,_, ask_VB yourself_PRP why_WRB she_PRP continues_VBZ to_TO be_VB invited_VBN to_TO these_DT public_JJ forums_NNS ._. 
What_WP exactly_RB is_VBZ she_PRP adding_VBG to_TO these_DT conversations_NNS ?_. 
In_IN all_DT my_PRP$ cable_NN news_NN watching_NN ,_, I_PRP 've_VBP seen_VBN far_RB more_JJR dim_NN characters_NNS than_IN O_NNP '_POS Donnell_NNP with_IN regular_JJ gigs_NNS ,_, so_IN it_PRP 's_VBZ not_RB the_DT fact_NN that_IN she_PRP 's_VBZ dumb_JJ that_WDT gets_VBZ her_PRP on_IN television_NN ._. 
My_PRP$ friend_NN tells_VBZ me_PRP of_IN certain_JJ connections_NNS individuals_NNS like_IN O_NNP '_POS Donnell_NNP have_VBP that_WDT gets_VBZ them_PRP the_DT leeway_NN they_PRP need_VBP to_TO raise_VB their_PRP$ public_JJ profile_NN ._. 
Since_IN they_PRP really_RB have_VBP no_DT one_CD to_TO answer_VB to_TO ,_, they_PRP can_MD go_VB on_IN television_NN and_CC say_VB anything_NN ,_, get_VB away_RB with_IN it_PRP ,_, and_CC do_VBP it_PRP again_RB in_IN yet_RB another_DT televised_JJ venue_NN ._. 
It_PRP 's_VBZ a_DT perpetual_JJ cycle_NN ._. 
She_PRP 's_VBZ not_RB campaigning_NN to_TO win_VB anything_NN ,_, I_PRP 'm_VBP telling_VBG you_PRP ,_, BC_NNP ._. 

You_PRP see_VBP how_WRB Rove_NNP immediately_RB rejected_VBD her_PRP ._. 
I_PRP do_VBP n't_RB believe_VB that_WDT was_VBD because_IN she_PRP beat_VBP the_DT "_'' establishment_NN "_'' candidate_NN ._. 
In_IN fact_NN ,_, my_PRP$ theory_NN is_VBZ that_IN Rove_NNP was_VBD n't_RB so_RB much_JJ as_IN rejecting_VBG her_PRP$ ,_, as_IN limiting_VBG her_PRP$ role_NN within_IN the_DT media_NNS environment_NN ._. 
I_PRP 'm_VBP thinking_VBG she_PRP 's_VBZ aiming_VBG to_TO be_VB on_IN FNC_NNP on_IN a_DT regular_JJ basis_NN ._. 
This_DT all_DT comes_VBZ from_IN my_PRP$ observing_VBG her_PRP$ debate_NN performances_NNS ,_, as_RB well_RB as_IN her_PRP$ more_RBR recent_JJ TV_NN appearances_NNS ._. 
She_PRP 's_VBZ not_RB so_RB much_JJ running_NN for_IN office_NN ,_, as_IN she_PRP is_VBZ auditioning_VBG to_TO be_VB a_DT regular_JJ voice_NN for_IN the_DT Cons_NNP ._. 
A_DT reaffirmation_NN of_IN sorts_NNS ._. 
She_PRP 's_VBZ been_VBN at_IN this_DT for_IN a_DT while_NN ,_, and_CC they_PRP have_VBP younger_JJR ,_, more_JJR loopier_NN and_CC dim-witted_JJ Con_NN tarts_NNS traipsing_VBG about_IN ._. 
Palin_NNP 's_POS taking_NN time_NN away_RB from_IN them_PRP ,_, but_CC she_PRP has_VBZ her_PRP$ own_JJ plans_NNS ,_, which_WDT have_VBP yet_RB to_TO be_VB revealed_VBN (_( though_IN they_PRP may_MD be_VB all_DT too_RB obvious_JJ )_) ._. 

Posted_VBN by_IN :_: Lexaburn_NNP at_IN October_NNP 20_CD ,_, 2010_CD 3:42_NN AM_NNP 
Christine_NNP O_NNP '_POS Donnell_NNP is_VBZ certainly_RB ignorant_NN in_IN the_DT sense_NN that_IN ,_, while_IN perfectly_RB aware_JJ that_IN there_EX are_VBP many_JJ things_NNS she_PRP does_VBZ n't_RB know_VB ,_, she_PRP is_VBZ clueless_JJ as_IN to_TO how_WRB that_WDT might_MD be_VB an_DT impediment_NN ._. 
It_PRP 's_VBZ an_DT odd_JJ combination_NN -_: knowing_VBG you_PRP do_VBP n't_RB really_RB have_VB a_DT solid_JJ grasp_NN on_IN a_DT subject_NN ,_, but_CC still_RB being_VBG convinced_VBN that_IN one_CD 's_POS core_NN principals_NNS are_VBP enough_RB to_TO overcome_VB any_DT obstacle_NN ._. 

O_NNP '_POS Donnell_NNP believes_VBZ in_IN the_DT bible_NN ._. 
She_PRP 's_VBZ a_DT Jesus_NNP freak_NN ._. 
And_CC that_DT 's_VBZ enough_RB for_IN her_PRP ._. 

O_NNP '_POS Donnell_NNP is_VBZ opposed_VBN to_TO anything_NN liberal_JJ ,_, anything_NN progressive_JJ ,_, anything_NN Obama_NNP ,_, anything_NN Democrat_NNP ,_, anything_NN that_WDT can_MD in_IN any_DT way_NN be_VB determined_VBN NOT_NNP to_TO accord_VB with_IN the_DT demands_NNS of_IN her_PRP$ savior_NN and_CC lord_NN jesus_JJ christ_NN (_( as_IN SHE_NNP interprets_VBZ his_PRP$ word_NN )_) in_IN any_DT way_NN ._. 
And_CC that_DT 's_VBZ enough_RB for_IN her_PRP ._. 
The_DT only_JJ reason_NN she_PRP 's_VBZ a_DT Republican_JJ /_NN Tea_NNP Party_NNP gangster_NN is_VBZ because_IN her_PRP$ brand_NN of_IN theocracy_NN and_CC batshit_NN stupidity_NN would_MD simply_RB never_RB fly_VB anywhere_RB else_RB ._. 
In_IN the_DT stumped_JJ ,_, frustrated_VBN ,_, hypocritcal_NN idiocy_NN of_IN the_DT extreme_JJ right_NN -_: in_IN that_DT gang_NN of_IN redneck_NN ignoramuses_NNS who_WP want_VBP simple_JJ answers_NNS to_TO complex_JJ questions_NNS they_PRP do_VBP not_RB understand_VB -_: she_PRP finds_VBZ the_DT only_JJ market_NN for_IN her_PRP$ brand_NN of_IN incompetent_JJ yammering_VBG ._. 

Facts_NNP do_VBP n't_RB matter_VB ._. 
Evidence_NN does_VBZ n't_RB matter_VB ._. 
History_NN does_VBZ n't_RB matter_VB ._. 
Just_RB look_VB at_IN the_DT clips_NNS Bill_NNP Maher_NNP runs_NNS of_IN her_PRP$ blithering_VBG ,_, insistent_JJ certainty_NN ._. 
She_PRP pisses_NNS off_IN EVERYONE_NN ,_, all_PDT the_DT time_NN ,_, and_CC never_RB once_RB =_SYM not_RB a_DT single_JJ time_NN ever_RB -_: stops_VBZ long_RB enough_RB to_TO even_RB CONSIDER_NNP that_IN maybe_RB she_PRP 's_VBZ the_DT one_CD who_WP does_VBZ n't_RB get_VB it_PRP ._. 
It_PRP 's_VBZ THEY_NNP who_WP do_VBP n't_RB get_VB it_PRP ._. 
The_DT constitutional_JJ lawyers_NNS do_VBP n't_RB know_VB fuck_NN all_DT about_IN the_DT constitution_NN ._. 
She_PRP does_VBZ because_IN she_PRP took_VBD a_DT week_NN long_JJ course_NN at_IN Oxford_NNP University_NNP !_. 
That_DT she_PRP lies_VBZ about_IN her_PRP$ academic_JJ credentials_NNS ,_, inflates_VBZ beyond_IN all_DT reason_NN and_CC truth_NN the_DT actual_JJ degree_NN of_IN study_NN she_PRP has_VBZ accomplished_VBN ,_, does_VBZ not_RB in_IN any_DT way_NN diminish_VB her_PRP$ insistence_NN that_IN she_PRP IS_VBZ highly_RB educated_VBN -_: really_RB VERY_NNP knowledgeable_JJ about_IN all_DT of_IN these_DT things_NNS she_PRP does_VBZ n't_RB know_VB about_IN ._. 

Richard_NNP Dawkins_NNP does_VBZ n't_RB know_VB anything_NN about_IN the_DT "_'' Theory_NNP "_'' of_IN evolution_NN ..._... he_PRP 's_VBZ just_RB a_DT cranky_NN atheist_NN !_. 
She_PRP read_VBP a_DT pamphlet_NN from_IN the_DT Discovery_NNP Institute_NNP that_WDT totally_RB explains_VBZ the_DT difference_NN between_IN Creationism_NNP and_CC Intelligent_NNP Design_NNP ..._... which_WDT are_VBP not_RB the_DT same_JJ things_NNS ,_, not_RB at_IN all_DT ,_, and_CC anyone_NN who_WP says_VBZ they_PRP are_VBP is_VBZ just_RB wrong_JJ ._. 
Especially_RB that_DT court_NN in_IN Dover_NNP that_WDT found_VBD ,_, as_IN a_DT matter_NN of_IN FACT_NNP ,_, that_IN the_DT ID_NNP crowd_NN simply_RB used_VBD "_'' Find_VBP &_CC Replace_NNP "_'' to_TO substitute_VB "_'' Intelligent_NNP Design_NNP "_'' for_IN "_'' Creation_NN "_'' (_( resulting_VBG in_IN numerous_JJ instances_NNS of_IN "_'' Intelligent_NNP Designism_NNP "_'' )_) ._. 
But_CC fuck_NN it_PRP ._. 
Everyone_NN is_VBZ wrong_JJ ,_, Christine_NNP O_NNP '_POS Donnell_NNP is_VBZ right_JJ ._. 
And_CC if_IN you_PRP disagree_VBP with_IN her_PRP$ ,_, then_RB you_PRP are_VBP properly_RB an_DT object_VBP of_IN scorn_NN and_CC derision_NN for_IN being_VBG so_RB poorly_RB informed_VBN about_IN things_NNS ._. 

It_PRP may_MD not_RB be_VB campaigning_NN to_TO WIN_NNP ._. 
She_PRP may_MD well_RB know_VB that_IN she_PRP 's_VBZ unelectable_JJ ._. 
But_CC in_IN her_PRP$ mind_NN that_WDT 's_VBZ because_IN the_DT voters_NNS have_VBP been_VBN brainwashed_JJ by_IN the_DT same_JJ evil_JJ ,_, wrong-headed_JJ liberal_JJ /_NN progressive_JJ indoctrination_NN that_WDT has_VBZ corrupted_JJ our_PRP$ schools_NNS ,_, our_PRP$ leaders_NNS and_CC our_PRP$ society_NN ._. 

Christine_NNP O_NNP '_POS Donnell_NNP does_VBZ n't_RB have_VB a_DT hidden_JJ agenda_NN ._. 
She_PRP sees_VBZ herself_PRP as_RB morally_RB correct_JJ ,_, profoundly_RB right_NN (_( in_IN both_DT senses_NNS of_IN the_DT term_NN )_) ,_, and_CC struggling_VBG as_IN only_RB a_DT jebus_JJ loving_JJ martyr_NN can_MD against_IN the_DT tide_NN of_IN evil_JJ sweeping_JJ her_PRP$ nation_NN ._. 

As_IN for_IN why_WRB she_PRP consistently_RB gets_VBZ to_TO appear_VB on_IN television_NN :_: She_PRP 's_VBZ fuckable_JJ ,_, in_IN that_DT weird_JJ Sarah_NNP Palin_NNP way_NN that_WDT makes_VBZ me_PRP recoil_NN in_IN horror_NN and_CC wonder_VBP what_WP the_DT fuck_NN is_VBZ wrong_JJ with_IN anyone_NN who_WP would_MD touch_VB those_DT women_NNS with_IN their_PRP$ worst_JJS enemy_NN 's_POS cock_NN ._. 
She_PRP 'll_MD say_VB apeshit_NN nuts_NNS things_NNS about_IN masturbation_NN ,_, and_CC flirting_VBG with_IN witchcraft_NN ,_, and_CC insist_VBP that_IN these_DT things_NNS that_IN SHE_NNP knows_VBZ -_: things_NNS no_DT one_CD else_RB knows_VBZ (_( like_IN the_DT top_JJ secret_JJ information_NN about_IN China_NNP 's_POS plans_NNS to_TO take_VB over_IN the_DT USA_NNP to_TO which_WDT only_RB SHE_NNP is_VBZ privy_JJ !_. )_) places_VBZ her_PRP in_IN the_DT unique_JJ position_NN to_TO lecture_VB Obama_NNP on_IN Con_NN Law_NNP ,_, Henry_NNP Kissinger_NNP on_IN foreign_JJ policy_NN history_NN ,_, Richard_NNP Dawkins_NNP on_IN evolution_NN ,_, Lawrence_NNP Krause_NNP on_IN cosmology_NN and_CC Murray_NNP Gell-_NNP Mann_NNP on_IN particle_NN physics_NN ._. 
She_PRP KNOWS_NNP things_NNS ,_, see_VB ?_. 
Jebus_NNP tells_VBZ her_PRP$ things_NNS ._. 

Frankly_RB I_PRP think_VBP it_PRP 's_VBZ the_DT result_NN of_IN the_DT move_NN in_IN the_DT 70_CD 's_POS and_CC 80_CD 's_POS to_TO tell_VB students_NNS that_IN they_PRP were_VBD ALL_NNP special_JJ ;_: that_IN no_DT one_CD was_VBD any_DT better_JJR or_CC any_RB smarter_RBR than_IN anyone_NN else_RB ;_: that_DT everyone_NN has_VBZ a_DT RIGHT_NNP to_TO their_PRP$ own_JJ opinion_NN ;_: to_TO make_VB sure_JJ that_DT everyone_NN who_WP played_VBD the_DT game_NN got_VBD a_DT trophy_NN ._. 
Now_RB those_DT self-inflated_JJ ,_, self-important_JJ ,_, self-esteem_NN fiddled_JJ crowd_NN are_VBP running_VBG for_IN office_NN ,_, and_CC they_PRP are_VBP fucking_VBG well_RB convinced_VBN that_IN they_PRP DO_NNP know_VB as_RB much_JJ as_IN anyone_NN else_RB ,_, and_CC their_PRP$ OPINIONS_NNP about_IN things_NNS are_VBP just_RB as_RB valid_JJ as_IN anyone_NN else_RB 's_POS ..._... even_RB moreso_NN because_IN "_'' it_PRP 's_VBZ MY_NNP opinion_NN ..._... and_CC who_WP are_VBP YOU_PRP to_TO tell_VB me_PRP that_IN I_PRP do_VBP n't_RB know_VB what_WP I_PRP 'm_VBP talking_VBG about_RP ?_. 
YOU_PRP do_VBP n't_RB know_VB what_WP you_PRP 're_VBP talking_VBG about_IN !_. 
"_'' 
Knowing_VBG she_PRP 's_VBZ going_VBG to_TO lose_VB is_VBZ not_RB the_DT same_JJ thing_NN as_IN running_VBG TO_TO lose_VB ..._... in_IN the_DT same_JJ way_NN that_IN knowing_VBG she_PRP really_RB does_VBZ n't_RB know_VB much_JJ about_IN the_DT constitution_NN will_MD never_RB prevent_VB her_PRP from_IN telling_VBG you_PRP what_WP it_PRP must_MD mean_VB ._. 
She_PRP thinks_VBZ she_PRP 's_VBZ right_JJ today_NN ,_, and_CC she_PRP will_MD think_VB she_PRP 's_VBZ right_NN after_IN being_VBG stomped_VBD to_TO death_NN at_IN the_DT polls_NNS ._. 
She_PRP will_MD continue_VB to_TO blither_NN her_PRP$ vacuous_JJ bullshit_NN on_IN any_DT platform_NN she_PRP can_MD find_VB ,_, spend_VB campaign_NN money_NN on_IN her_PRP$ rent_NN ,_, and_CC go_VB to_TO bed_NN every_DT night_NN feeling_NN as_IN though_IN she_PRP is_VBZ fighting_VBG the_DT good_JJ fight_NN for_IN jebus_JJ ,_, truth_NN and_CC America_NNP ._. 

Posted_VBN by_IN :_: cousinavi_NN at_IN October_NNP 20_CD ,_, 2010_CD 4:43_NN AM_NNP 
Lex_NNP -_: Thanks_NNS for_IN the_DT clarification_NN ._. 
It_PRP looks_VBZ like_IN you_PRP might_MD have_VB an_DT inside_JJ track_NN into_IN this_DT person_NN 's_POS make_NN up_RB ._. 
But_CC I_PRP 'm_VBP still_RB going_VBG to_TO think_VB that_IN her_PRP$ smile_NN was_VBD n't_RB so_RB much_JJ that_IN she_PRP 's_VBZ in_IN on_IN the_DT joke_NN as_IN it_PRP was_VBD she_PRP really_RB does_VBZ think_VB she_PRP knows_VBZ what_WP she_PRP 's_VBZ talking_VBG about_IN ._. 
It_PRP is_VBZ a_DT debate_NN after_IN all_DT ,_, a_DT competition_NN ._. 
To_TO just_RB shrug_VB your_PRP$ shoulders_NNS and_CC throw_VB a_DT hail_NN mary_JJ pass_NN with_IN a_DT smile_NN on_IN your_PRP$ face_NN would_MD be_VB suicidal_JJ ._. 
But_CC really_RB ,_, who_WP the_DT hell_NN knows_VBZ ?_. 

Posted_VBN by_IN :_: Broadway_NNP Carl_NNP at_IN October_NNP 20_CD ,_, 2010_CD 9:56_NN AM_NNP 
Avi-_NNP I_PRP agree_VBP with_IN you_PRP completely_RB ,_, except_IN that_IN I_PRP believe_VBP the_DT "_'' everyone_NN is_VBZ special_JJ "_'' crowd_NN started_VBD in_IN the_DT 90_CD 's_POS ._. 
I_PRP grew_VBD up_RB in_IN the_DT 70_CD 's_POS and_CC there_EX were_VBD no_DT "_'' gifted_JJ "_'' programs_NNS for_IN kids_NNS who_WP did_VBD n't_RB happen_VB to_TO drool_NN on_IN themselves_PRP back_RB then_RB ._. 
The_DT "_'' entitlement_NN because_IN I_PRP deserve_VBP it_PRP "_'' generation_NN is_VBZ currently_RB in_IN their_PRP$ early_JJ to_TO mid_JJ 20_CD 's_POS ._. 
My_PRP$ wife_NN deals_NNS with_IN them_PRP all_PDT the_DT time_NN at_IN her_PRP$ place_NN of_IN employment_NN ._. 

Posted_VBN by_IN :_: at_IN October_NNP 20_CD ,_, 2010_CD 10:06_NN AM_NNP 
